| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alexander Borkowski" <alexander(dot)borkowski(at)abri(dot)une(dot)edu(dot)au> |
| Cc: | "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: wx 2.5.3 success! |
| Date: | 2004-10-13 07:58:01 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306B37@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Borkowski
> [mailto:alexander(dot)borkowski(at)abri(dot)une(dot)edu(dot)au]
> Sent: 13 October 2004 08:45
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wx 2.5.3 success!
>
> [pgAdmin III with wx 2.5.3 on Windows]
> >>I just tried under Windows XP and it builds fine (you have to copy
> >>include/wx/setup_redirect.h to include/wx/setup.h and set
> >>wxDIALOG_UNIT_COMPATIBILITY to 0 in include/wx/msw/setup.h).
> >
> >
> > Oh, didn't it used to be setup0.h?
>
> setup.h worked for me and the wx documentation (e.g.
> INSTALL-MSW.txt) mentions setup0.h only if you are installing
> from the CVS version, which I am not as I used the Windows
> installer. But maybe you are using the CVS version? I don't
> know enough about wx to be able to clarify this ...
Yeah, normally I am using CVS. The idea of installing wx using an
installer seems quite novel to me, given the amount of time I spend
repackaging our versions of it!!
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-10-13 09:20:21 | Re: wx 2.5.3 success! |
| Previous Message | Alexander Borkowski | 2004-10-13 07:45:02 | Re: wx 2.5.3 success! |