From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Oliver D(dot)" <oliver(at)inadd(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Win32 libpq : Static Link ? |
Date: | 2004-10-04 08:34:26 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306898@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oliver D. [mailto:oliver(at)inadd(dot)com]
> Sent: 04 October 2004 09:08
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 libpq : Static Link ?
>
>
> Le 4 oct. 04, à 09:37, Dave Page a écrit :
>
> > Yes, until a week ago, pgAdmin III linked statically against a VC++
> > compiled libpq.lib. It sounds to me like the libpq.lib you
> have is not
> > actually a static library, but an import library for the DLL.
> >
> > Regards, Dave
>
> Ah, It should explain why my compiled app is so light ;-) But
> i've just compiled libpq las friday. So I supposed it was OK.
> Is there a way to know if the compiled ?lib is OK ?
> Or, much more simple for me, is there a way to get a proper,
> already compiled, libpq.lib ?
The older 2 files at http://pgadmin.postgresql.org/snapshots/postgresql/ are static iirc. The newest (and smallest) is certainly dynamic. They are all in MS format.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Reini Urban | 2004-10-04 11:17:29 | Re: open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore |
Previous Message | Oliver D. | 2004-10-04 08:08:20 | Re: Win32 libpq : Static Link ? |