Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy
Date: 2004-09-30 19:06:47
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306827@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus
> Sent: 30 September 2004 17:47
> To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [#14748606]
> comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy
>
> Dave,
>
> > Thank you for the information you provided in your reply. We really
> > appreciate your feedback, and we'll keep it in mind as we work to
> > improve Google Groups.
>
> This looks to me like they cut us off for ulterior reasons
> and are avoiding
> the topic. Does it look that way to anyone else?

Yes. I'm just not sure whether it's because we're a database project, or
because they're trying to wind down groups.google which I can't imagine
makes them a whole lot of cash. Any other theories?

> Is it time to hunt up members of the community who have
> contacts at google, or start an e-mail petition drive?

Both I say.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2004-09-30 19:11:01 Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-09-30 19:02:00 archives.postgresql.org cleaned up ... and rebuilding ...