Re: Server unreliability

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server unreliability
Date: 2004-09-30 07:32:35
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E43067D2@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Devrim GUNDUZ
> Sent: 29 September 2004 23:03
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List; PostgreSQL advocacy
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Server unreliability
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >> :-) A Google search box could be better sometimes...
> >
> > Yes, except Google has decided to stop archiving our groups since
> > September 16. We reported this on the www list, I think. I think
> > they had the best archive interface, and now it is gone.
> Take a look:
> >
> >
> >
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&c2coff=1&group=comp
> > .databases.postgresql.hackers
>
> Dave has contacted with Google, and I'm sure that they'll
> solve this problem. See:

It's not looking good. I think we're going to need a mass of complaints
form the users.

Regards, Dave

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2004-09-30 07:49:58 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Infrastructure TODO list
Previous Message Dave Page 2004-09-30 07:30:13 Re: Server unreliability