| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: win32 pgsql not installable |
| Date: | 2004-07-27 21:01:34 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E41A7497@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 27 July 2004 23:55
> To: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Cc: Magnus Hagander; Dave Page
> Subject: win32 pgsql not installable
>
> I know I'm going to go on some people's nerves, but it's necessary.
>
> With the current "run-as-non-admin" restriction the windows
> installer doesn't work, and it will probably be ridiculously
> difficult to make it work unless this restriction is redesigned.
It's a pita for ad-hoc use, but installation and running as a service
works perfectly here.
> I don't see any point in restricting postgres.exe (i.e. the
> single user non-communicating version) to non-superusers.
> Installations are usually executed with admin privileges
> (non-admins won't be able to create services), and currently
> it fails to initialize the cluster with that d***d message.
> Consequently, it rolls back the complete installation leaving
> me at point zero.
Whats the error?
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-07-27 22:54:55 | win32 pgsql not installable |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-07-27 21:00:50 | Re: win32 pgsql not installable |