Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Status of

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,"PostgreSQL WWW" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Status of
Date: 2006-09-14 07:13:30
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org 
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Joshua D. Drake
> Sent: 13 September 2006 23:51
> To: PostgreSQL WWW
> Subject: [pgsql-www] Status of
> What is the status of

I don't recall it ever being asked for. Why would we need another
subsite anyway? What wrong with using <gasp>


In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2006-09-14 09:29:36
Subject: Re: Who admins DNS?
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-09-13 22:50:38
Subject: Status of

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group