| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, "PostgreSQL WWW" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A counter productive conversation about search. |
| Date: | 2006-08-29 14:54:50 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40154C8BF@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com]
> Sent: 29 August 2006 15:32
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: John Hansen; PostgreSQL WWW
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] A counter productive conversation
> about search.
>
>
> > ServerWeight 100
> > Server http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/
> > ServerWeight 50
> > Server http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/
> >
> > I did get shot down as well though - iirc it was Oleg who was
> > essentially saying that the search engine should not have
> any knowledge
> > of the site beyond what it crawled.
>
> That won't work in aspseek. I looked into that too. It applies the
> weight to the whole site.
Yeah, I was confusing my self with options in Mnogosearch (which is very
similar in many ways).
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2006-08-29 15:07:56 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-08-29 14:54:10 | Re: A counter productive conversation about search. |