From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: localpipe |
Date: | 2006-02-27 16:55:34 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40103E469@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 27 February 2006 16:47
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Peter Eisentraut; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] localpipe
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> >>[mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
> >>Peter Eisentraut
> >>Sent: 24 February 2006 09:45
> >>To: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> >>Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] localpipe
> >>
> >>pgAdmin talks about a <localpipe>, but the thing is in fact a local
> >>socket, not a pipe. I suggest the following change.
>
> Hm, easily mixed up with localhost, which uses a socket too. But we
> don't have the space for 'local unix socket' either.
'UDS'? Personally I think socket is better than localpipe though, even
granted that it's still potentially ambiguous.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-02-27 17:01:21 | Re: Buildproblems on OSX 10.3 due to libxml2 |
Previous Message | OpenMacNews | 2006-02-27 16:48:40 | Re: Buildproblems on OSX 10.3 due to libxml2 |