| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | pgsql: lwlock: Fix, currently harmless, bug in LWLockWakeup() |
| Date: | 2025-11-24 23:12:12 |
| Message-ID: | E1vNfjA-001FH5-0W@gemulon.postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
lwlock: Fix, currently harmless, bug in LWLockWakeup()
Accidentally the code in LWLockWakeup() checked the list of to-be-woken up
processes to see if LW_FLAG_HAS_WAITERS should be unset. That means that
HAS_WAITERS would not get unset immediately, but only during the next,
unnecessary, call to LWLockWakeup().
Luckily, as the code stands, this is just a small efficiency issue.
However, if there were (as in a patch of mine) a case in which LWLockWakeup()
would not find any backend to wake, despite the wait list not being empty,
we'd wrongly unset LW_FLAG_HAS_WAITERS, leading to potentially hanging.
While the consequences in the backbranches are limited, the code as-is
confusing, and it is possible that there are workloads where the additional
wait list lock acquisitions hurt, therefore backpatch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fvfmkr5kk4nyex56ejgxj3uzi63isfxovp2biecb4bspbjrze7@az2pljabhnff
Backpatch-through: 14
Branch
------
REL_16_STABLE
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/89c8a1b9069f7f1375b114c85258289f77b03a0f
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-11-25 01:56:05 | pgsql: Rename routines for write/read of pgstats file |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-11-24 22:57:40 | pgsql: Avoid global LC_CTYPE dependency in pg_locale_libc.c. |