Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,"Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?
Date: 2007-06-04 10:02:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > > Given this, I propose we simply #ifdef out the SO_REUSEADDR on

I agree, that this is what we should do.

> > > (A fairly good reference to read up on the options is at 
> > >
> > 
> > Hmm ... if accurate, that page says in words barely longer than one 
> > syllable that Microsoft entirely misunderstands the intended meaning

> Yes, that's how I read it as well.
> > It looks like SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE might be a bit closer to the 
> > standard semantics; should we use that instead on Windoze?
> I think you're reading something wrong. The way I read it, 
> SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE gives us pretty much the same behavior we have on
> *without* SO_REUSEADDR. There's a paragraph specificallyi 
> talking about the problem of restarting a server having to 
> wait for a timeout when using this switch.

Yup, that switch is no good eighter.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2007-06-04 10:12:20
Subject: Re: Upcoming events
Previous:From: Enrico SirolaDate: 2007-06-04 09:30:50
Subject: Re: table partitioning pl/pgsql helpers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group