| From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Koichi Suzuki" <suzuki(dot)koichi(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Full page writes improvement, code update |
| Date: | 2007-04-25 08:00:16 |
| Message-ID: | E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA57901F40143@m0143.s-mxs.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> > 1) To deal with partial/inconsisitent write to the data file at
crash
> > recovery, we need full page writes at the first modification to
pages
> > after each checkpoint. It consumes much of WAL space.
>
> We need to find a way around this someday. Other DBs don't
> do this; it may be becuase they're less durable, or because
> they fixed the problem.
They eighter can only detect a failure later (this may be a very long
time depending on access and verify runs) or they also write page
images. Those that write page images usually write "before images" to a
different area that is cleared periodically (e.g. during checkpoint).
Writing to a different area was considered in pg, but there were more
negative issues than positive.
So imho pg_compresslog is the correct path forward. The current
discussion is only about whether we want a more complex pg_compresslog
and no change to current WAL, or an increased WAL size for a less
complex implementation.
Both would be able to compress the WAL to the same "archive log" size.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-04-25 08:03:41 | Buildfarm: Stage logs not available for MSVC builds |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Drake | 2007-04-25 06:48:30 | Re: tsearch2 in 8.3 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2007-04-25 08:27:15 | autovacuum does not start in HEAD |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-24 21:10:33 | Re: SPI_psprintf and SPI_pstrdup |