Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Languages and Functions

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: "Robert James" <srobertjames(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Languages and Functions
Date: 2007-05-29 15:30:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
On May 29, 2007, at 9:49 , Robert James wrote:

> 1. How can I get a list of available functions (ie, user defined or  
> contrib) using SQL?

You can take a look in the pg_proc table, which is part of the system  
catalog, to see which functions are installed.


You might try something like

SELECT proname
        , pronargs
        , lanname
FROM pg_proc
         SELECT oid as prolang, lanname
         FROM pg_language) AS lang
ORDER BY proname, pronargs, lanname;
               proname               | pronargs | lanname
RI_FKey_cascade_del                |        0 | internal
RI_FKey_cascade_upd                |        0 | internal
RI_FKey_check_ins                  |        0 | internal
RI_FKey_check_upd                  |        0 | internal

> 2. Is there any performance or other advantage to using PL/pgsql  
> over Pl/Perl or Python?

It depends on what your function is doing. If you're doing simple SQL- 
type things, PL/pgsql might be a good fit. If you're doing more  
advanced text processing or calling external libraries, PL/Perl could  
be better. I don't have any experience with Python.

As with all things, test and benchmark to for your particular case  
for the best results :)

Hope this helps.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to


pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Richard HuxtonDate: 2007-05-29 15:34:51
Subject: Re: Languages and Functions
Previous:From: A. KretschmerDate: 2007-05-29 15:18:19
Subject: Re: Will a DELETE violate an FK?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group