Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

From: 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca" <movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca>
Cc: Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date: 2020-09-11 15:00:12
Message-ID: E009FDD3-D2F9-45E6-B378-62BC6A44CBE6@alibaba-inc.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I have written the README for the GTT, which contains the GTT requirements and design.
I found that compared to my first email a year ago, many GTT Limitations are now gone.
Now, I'm adding comments to some of the necessary functions.

Wenjing

Attachment Content-Type Size
global_temporary_table_v36-pg13.patch application/octet-stream 215.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-09-11 15:06:26 Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2020-09-11 14:57:36 [patch] _bt_binsrch* improvements - equal-prefix-skip binary search