Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [sysadmins] List moderation - need a break!

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, sysadmins <sysadmins(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [sysadmins] List moderation - need a break!
Date: 2009-06-23 10:31:26
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
On 23 jun 2009, at 12.14, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Dave Page wrote:
>>>>> Ultimately it seems the failure to fix this problem is just  
>>>>> because
>>>>> Marc is the only one able to do it, and he's not around enough.
>>>> No, the real problem is having our mail infrastructure tied into
>>>> as a number of us have said before.
>>> Now that I have those two new servers in place, if someone wants to
>>> setup spamassassin on that VPS itself to run instead of going  
>>> through
>>> the global spamassassin daemon, I'm cool with that ... I haven't  
>>> moved
>>> mail over to the new servers yet, but that just takes 15-20  
>>> minutes of
>>> downtime to make happen ... could do that tomorrow evening ...
>> Just to be absolutely clear on what you're saying here.
>> Are you saying that you are now OK with de-coupling the  
>> mail from making it a community managed service?
>> Or are you saying that you're ok with running a *second* instance of
>> spamassassin, and still keep mail going through relays?
> I'm okay with a dedicated instance of spamassassin running in 
>  so that it can be more tailored / configured to mark spam going  
> through to the moderators ...

So you're still not accepting that the mail services are a community  
service and resource.  Ok, sorry to hear that, but good to know.

In that case, the the statement by Dave still stands - this does not  
fix the actual issue. It does paint over one crack a bit, but it does  
nothing to fix the structural problem.


In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2009-06-23 11:08:31
Subject: Contest: PostgreSQL Website Redesign
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2009-06-23 10:14:51
Subject: Re: [sysadmins] List moderation - need a break!

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group