| From: | Selena Deckelmann <sdeckelmann(at)chrisking(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Dropping postgres as a whole. |
| Date: | 2007-09-27 17:11:34 |
| Message-ID: | D88EC1E3-7379-49C1-9338-25AA6A925B20@chrisking.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sep 27, 2007, at 9:39 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was just talking with one of my developers (Alexey) and he said, why
> not just use Pg. Which is an interesting point. Consider that
> Volkswagen
> is properly known as Volkswagen but commonly (and most of the time)
> referred to as VW.
>
> Why don't we just stop this whole PostgreSQL->Postgres->Postgre
> junk and
> just say, PostgreSQL, also referred to as PG.
>
> Heck, I know plenty of people that just say PG, or PGSQL, myself
> included.
+1 I like it.
From a design standpoint, 'Pg' is nicer. I know we're not there yet,
but just sayin'.
-selena
--
Selena Deckelmann
Information Systems Manager
Chris King Precision Components
Made in Portland, Oregon
www.chrisking.com / 503.972.4050 x230
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2007-09-27 17:14:07 | Re: Dropping postgres as a whole. |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-09-27 16:39:40 | Dropping postgres as a whole. |