| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tim Hart" <tjhart(at)mac(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Sullivan" <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Support (was: Democracy and organisation) |
| Date: | 2002-06-27 07:30:47 |
| Message-ID: | D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF61015420@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au]
> Sent: 27 June 2002 08:08
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Tim Hart
> Cc: Andrew Sullivan; pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Support (was: Democracy and organisation)
>
>
> Hmmm...
>
> I think this is a common fallacy. It's like arguing that if
> windoze crashes and you lose important data then you have
> some sort of legal recourse against Microsoft. Ever read one
> of their EULAs? $10 says that Oracle's license grants them
> absolute immunity to any kind of damages claim.
I'm inclined to agree, though if it were the case, just buy Red Hat
Database.
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-06-27 12:28:25 | Re: Postgres idea list |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-06-27 07:08:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Support (was: Democracy and organisation) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim Hart | 2002-06-27 07:32:53 | Re: Why I like partial solutions |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-06-27 07:08:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Support (was: Democracy and organisation) |