From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns |
Date: | 2010-01-24 19:01:10 |
Message-ID: | D623B0533356DD1025F467E8@amenophis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
--On 24. Januar 2010 19:45:33 +0100 Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
wrote:
> I don't see where this should be related to the number of tables not
> part of the inheritance tree (or inheritance at all).
To answer that myself: it seems get_attname() introduces the overhead here
(forgot about that). Creating additional 16384 tables without any
connection to the inheritance increases the times on my Phenom-II Box to
round about 2 seconds:
Current -HEAD
bernd=# ALTER TABLE a1 RENAME COLUMN acol1 TO xyz;
ALTER TABLE
Time: 409,045 ms
With KaiGai's recent patch:
bernd=# ALTER TABLE a1 RENAME COLUMN acol1 TO xyz;
ALTER TABLE
Time: 2402,306 ms
--
Thanks
Bernd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2010-01-24 19:15:51 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2010-01-24 18:50:34 | Re: Resetting a single statistics counter |