Re: Mark a transaction uncommittable

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mark a transaction uncommittable
Date: 2023-07-03 14:07:53
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 5 Jun 2023, at 09:22, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im> wrote:

> Please see attached the patch that introduces this new feature.

This patch fails the guc_check test due to something missing in the sample
configuration. Please send a rebased version with this test fixed.

[08:31:26.680] --- stdout ---
[08:31:26.680] # executing test in /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/build/testrun/test_misc/003_check_guc group test_misc test 003_check_guc
[08:31:26.680] not ok 1 - no parameters missing from postgresql.conf.sample
[08:31:26.680] ok 2 - no parameters missing from guc_tables.c
[08:31:26.680] ok 3 - no parameters marked as NOT_IN_SAMPLE in postgresql.conf.sample
[08:31:26.680] 1..3
[08:31:26.680] # test failed

Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2023-07-03 14:12:49 Re: pg_basebackup check vs Windows file path limits
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-07-03 14:02:37 Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints