| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Mark a transaction uncommittable |
| Date: | 2023-07-03 14:07:53 |
| Message-ID: | D51838FE-BA46-460A-A715-5D4A7F57DB0E@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 5 Jun 2023, at 09:22, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im> wrote:
> Please see attached the patch that introduces this new feature.
This patch fails the guc_check test due to something missing in the sample
configuration. Please send a rebased version with this test fixed.
[08:31:26.680] --- stdout ---
[08:31:26.680] # executing test in /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/build/testrun/test_misc/003_check_guc group test_misc test 003_check_guc
[08:31:26.680] not ok 1 - no parameters missing from postgresql.conf.sample
[08:31:26.680] ok 2 - no parameters missing from guc_tables.c
[08:31:26.680] ok 3 - no parameters marked as NOT_IN_SAMPLE in postgresql.conf.sample
[08:31:26.680] 1..3
[08:31:26.680] # test failed
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2023-07-03 14:12:49 | Re: pg_basebackup check vs Windows file path limits |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-07-03 14:02:37 | Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints |