| From: | "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: US Patents vs Non-US software ... |
| Date: | 2005-01-17 23:40:39 |
| Message-ID: | D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F894415470557F8@postal.corporate.connx.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
It varies from country to country. Here are some relevant links.
http://www.researchoninnovation.org/online.htm
http://www.abul.org/brevets/articles/tsuba_refs.php3?langnew=en
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Marc G.
Fournier
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 3:32 PM
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [HACKERS] US Patents vs Non-US software ...
Just curious here, but are patents global? PostgreSQL is not US
software,
but it is run within the US ... so, would this patent, if it goes
through,
only affect those using PostgreSQL in the US, or do patents somehow
transcend international borders?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services
(http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ:
7615664
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-17 23:43:28 | Re: ARC patent |
| Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2005-01-17 23:38:28 | Re: ARC patent |