Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: getProcedureColumns

From: Jeffrey Cox <namredips(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: getProcedureColumns
Date: 2007-02-14 19:40:01
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
On Feb 14, 2007, at 12:47 PM, Kris Jurka wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Jeffrey Cox wrote:
>> So in the end, what you are saying is stop being a ninny and  fire  
>> up more versions of the DBMS and properly test this... sorry about  
>> that. Do you all have a recommended test setup. (i.e. do you have  
>> every version up and running?)
> I'm saying, I know how much of a pain this is to test on all  
> versions, so if you're not up to it, I'll do it.  I'm just not  
> currently at a machine that has all of them installed.  And yes, I  
> do have 7.2 - 8.3dev all available (and sometimes even multiple  
> versions of them for things like --enable-integer-datetimes) and  
> the regression tests should pass against all of them.

I know it's a pain, but I will test it... I just need to get the all  
the servers up and running. It might take me some time to get them up  
and going, but shouldn't be to troubling. I was just making light of  
me being sloppy and not fully testing the patches I submitted. I hope  
you didn't take offense... Anyhow, I will send you a new patch soon  
as I test across all version.


> Kris Jurka

In response to


pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2007-02-14 19:46:46
Subject: Re: stringtype=unspecified problem
Previous:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2007-02-14 19:36:15
Subject: Re: bug report: preparedStatement.setObject(indx,"2004-August-15",java.sql.Types.DATE) generates number format exception

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group