| From: | "Mohan, Ross" <RMohan(at)arbinet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Table Partitioning: Will it be supported in Future? |
| Date: | 2005-04-26 16:58:31 |
| Message-ID: | CC74E7E10A8A054798B6611BD1FEF4D307966BF5@vamail01.thexchange.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Maybe he needs to spend $7K on performance improvements?
;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 8:00 PM
To: Richard Huxton
Cc: apoc9009(at)yahoo(dot)de; pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Table Partitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Richard,
> I believe these are being worked on at the moment. You might want to
> search the archives of the hackers mailing list to see if the plans
> will suit your needs.
Actually, this is being discussed through the Bizgres project:
www.bizgres.org.
However, I agree that a 1GB table is not in need of partitioning.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Poe | 2005-04-26 17:49:46 | Re: pgbench Comparison of 7.4.7 to 8.0.2 |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-04-26 15:53:46 | Re: Table Partitioning: Will it be supported in Future? |