Re: [PATCH] nodeindexscan with reorder memory leak

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Aliaksandr Kalenik <akalenik(at)kontur(dot)io>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nodeindexscan with reorder memory leak
Date: 2022-02-14 01:18:53
Message-ID: CAPpHfdvJd8mqu3NkRHE_G9uJmru2O9t6S0_xyLndO-DsXNN47Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 2:35 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I've rechecked that the now patched code branch is covered by
> > regression tests. I think the memory leak issue is independent of the
> > computational errors we've observed.
> > So, I'm going to push and backpatch this if no objections.
>
> +1. We should work on the roundoff-error issue as well, but
> as you say, it's an independent problem.

Pushed, thank you.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-02-14 01:53:04 Re: pgsql: Add suport for server-side LZ4 base backup compression.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-02-14 00:02:29 Re: pgsql: Add suport for server-side LZ4 base backup compression.