Re: PoC: Partial sort

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PoC: Partial sort
Date: 2015-10-16 16:11:42
Message-ID: CAPpHfdv3oMLWQoNuHK=JxrugyRrjUjq-434Pm_rAYRDCCndBhA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
> wrote:
> > Are you planning to work on this patch for 9.6?
>
> FWIW I hope so. It's a nice patch.
>

I'm trying to to whisk dust. Rebased version of patch is attached. This
patch isn't passing regression tests because of plan changes. I'm not yet
sure about those changes: why they happens and are they really regression?
Since I'm not very familiar with planning of INSERT ON CONFLICT and RLS,
any help is appreciated.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
partial-sort-basic-3.patch application/octet-stream 73.8 KB
regression.diffs application/octet-stream 3.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2015-10-16 16:20:26 Proposal: SET ROLE hook
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-10-16 16:07:38 Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes