Re: PoC: Partial sort

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PoC: Partial sort
Date: 2015-10-16 16:11:42
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
> wrote:
> > Are you planning to work on this patch for 9.6?
> FWIW I hope so. It's a nice patch.

I'm trying to to whisk dust. Rebased version of patch is attached. This
patch isn't passing regression tests because of plan changes. I'm not yet
sure about those changes: why they happens and are they really regression?
Since I'm not very familiar with planning of INSERT ON CONFLICT and RLS,
any help is appreciated.

Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional:
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
partial-sort-basic-3.patch application/octet-stream 73.8 KB
regression.diffs application/octet-stream 3.8 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2015-10-16 16:20:26 Proposal: SET ROLE hook
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-10-16 16:07:38 Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes