Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: "Shinoda, Noriyoshi" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Date: 2018-04-09 14:21:48
Message-ID: CAPpHfdtTbmVPdPfJxyANm_VdvR+SFeHmjWZChjktTB17S-Luew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Shinoda, Noriyoshi <
noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com> wrote:

> I tested this feature and found a document shortage in the columns added
> to the pg_constraint catalog.
> The attached patch will add the description of the 'conincluding' column
> to the manual of the pg_constraint catalog.
>

Thank you for pointing this!
I think we need more wordy explanation here. My proposal is attached.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_constraint-2.patch application/octet-stream 854 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anthony Iliopoulos 2018-04-09 14:22:06 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-04-09 14:19:40 Re: Documentation for bootstrap data conversion