| From: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort |
| Date: | 2017-11-14 18:42:27 |
| Message-ID: | CAPpHfdsxzHMsC-qV=eRkTPiqJsGC+hc_gHLggKfSckzxTBEFWA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> > Patch rebased to current master is attached. I'm going to improve my
> testing script and post new results.
>
> I wanted to review this patch but incremental-sort-8.patch fails to apply.
> Can
> you please rebase it again?
>
Sure, please find rebased patch attached.
Also, I'd like to share partial results of benchmarks with 100M of rows.
It appears that for 100M of rows it takes quite amount of time. Perhaps in
cases when there were degradation on 1M of rows, it becomes somewhat
bigger...
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| incremental-sort-9.patch | application/octet-stream | 118.5 KB |
| results_100m_partial.csv | text/csv | 84.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-11-14 18:43:36 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-11-14 18:12:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table |