Re: postgres_fdw: commit remote (sub)transactions in parallel during pre-commit

From: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: commit remote (sub)transactions in parallel during pre-commit
Date: 2022-07-07 08:22:32
Message-ID: CAPmGK16j4yiWnFngGAJM_05ZwPSZWHW0xwb_5YrACd40=AyJyQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Jacob,

On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 3:50 AM Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
> On 5/12/22 01:46, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 7:39 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I’m planning to commit this as a follow-up patch for commit 04e706d42.
> >
> > Done.
>
> FYI, I think cfbot is confused about the patch under review here. (When
> I first opened the thread I thought the patch had already been committed.)

I should have attached the patch in the previous email.

> For new reviewers: it looks like v8, upthread, is the proposal.

The patch needs rebase due to commits 4036bcbbb, 8c8d307f8 and
82699edbf, so I updated the patch. Attached is a new version, in
which I also tweaked comments a little bit.

Thanks for taking care of this!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

Attachment Content-Type Size
v9-postgres-fdw-Add-support-for-parallel-abort.patch application/octet-stream 27.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-07-07 08:24:59 Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2022-07-07 07:54:30 Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions