Re: archive modules

From: talk to ben <blo(dot)talkto(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: archive modules
Date: 2022-08-24 08:05:55
Message-ID: CAPE8EZ7vh6gdgHjAYhuvjUJzvZm7PGeZQaDDBfSYmDmfa+QeFg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On one hand, it seems like folks will commonly encounter this behavior
with this
> module, so this feels like a natural place for such a note.

Yes, I looked there first.

Would this addition to the pg_settings description be better ?

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-basic_archive-parameter-visibility-doc-patch.patch text/x-patch 1.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-08-24 08:40:07 Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL
Previous Message Erik Rijkers 2022-08-24 08:04:45 Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15