| From: | Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda <acamari(at)verlet(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CREATE DOMAIN json vs built-in json |
| Date: | 2012-03-20 08:47:57 |
| Message-ID: | CAPD=2NgxuoGEQWJuX-c5nAe+jYkB=4gqNGLZtqAyCrR3Q3mVPg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've noticed our plv8 regression test now fails. It has CREATE DOMAIN
> json AS text ... and validates text via v8's JSON.parse(), which was
> working before introducing built-in json type. The test itself can be
> solved simply by creating schema, but my surprise is that we allow a
> domain whose name is the same as other base type. Is it intentional?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Hitoshi Harada
>
Mmm...
_n_srv=# create domain text as text;
CREATE DOMAIN
_n_srv=#
_n_srv=# create domain int as text;
CREATE DOMAIN
_n_srv=#
Mmm...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda | 2012-03-20 08:50:25 | Re: CREATE DOMAIN json vs built-in json |
| Previous Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2012-03-20 08:44:18 | CREATE DOMAIN json vs built-in json |