| From: | Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shinya Kato <shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: doc: Clarify ANALYZE VERBOSE output |
| Date: | 2026-04-05 18:08:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAOtHd0AY4LuM+-JqFyzs4mPHG8yeAwfP5yr2EZg21RVO0442BA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
It makes sense to align these, but I think the existing VACUUM wording
is not great. What do you think about something like the attached?
Basically, I changed both option descriptions to just be
Prints detailed progress for each table at <literal>INFO</literal> level.
I think the idea of _progress_ is important to communicate here. The
word "report" suggests more detailed information, that comes in a
batch after the action is completed.
Thanks,
Maciek
PS: I changed the patch name because I felt the original name is
misleading with my proposed change, and I left it at v1 because
starting a different name with v2 didn't make sense, but I'm not
trying to take authorship credit: most of the work here was finding
the discrepancy.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-doc-Clarify-VACUUM-VERBOSE-and-ANALYZE-VERBOSE-outpu.patch | text/x-patch | 1.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yousef Mohamed | 2026-04-05 22:38:17 | issue in the doc |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2026-04-04 16:04:23 | Re: The CREATE TABLE documentation groups NOT NULL under table_constraint. |