| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?) |
| Date: | 2026-03-10 16:32:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+=Pr7AAdkcKXyLw3ycxcrjGKsOV2CTYVV2PKYQw9ecG0Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 4:27 PM Jacob Champion
<jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I'll cherry-pick some of the -1 handling backwards in the patchset to
> handle this.
Done in v7-0001. Some of the improvements in the WIP patch were also
cherry-picked, and I fixed a stray comment bug. -0001 and -0002 are
next up for commit.
-0003 fills out the commit message and should be generally reviewable
now. -0004 adds the ability to LD_LIBRARY_PATH your way into flow
plugin development for the v20 cycle. -0005 becomes pretty much
useless other than for testing (and it should possible to adapt those
tests to -0004's implementation at some point).
Thanks,
--Jacob
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| since-v6.diff.txt | text/plain | 13.8 KB |
| v7-0001-libpq-oauth-Use-the-PGoauthBearerRequestV2-API.patch | application/octet-stream | 44.4 KB |
| v7-0002-libpq-oauth-Never-link-against-libpq-s-encoding-f.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.2 KB |
| v7-0003-libpq-Poison-the-v2-part-of-a-v1-Bearer-request.patch | application/octet-stream | 7.0 KB |
| v7-0004-libpq-Allow-developers-to-reimplement-libpq-oauth.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.8 KB |
| v7-0005-WIP-Introduce-third-party-OAuth-flow-plugins.patch | application/octet-stream | 36.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul A Jungwirth | 2026-03-10 16:33:18 | Re: domain for WITHOUT OVERLAPS |
| Previous Message | Paul A Jungwirth | 2026-03-10 16:31:58 | Re: domain for WITHOUT OVERLAPS |