Re: Default Partition for Range

From: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Default Partition for Range
Date: 2017-07-14 09:58:04
Message-ID: CAOG9ApGEZxSQD-ZD3icj_CwTmprSGG7sZ_r3k9m4rmcc6ozr=g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thank you for your review Dilip and Rahila.

PFA the updated patch which is rebased to Jeevan's latest list
partition patch [1] and also handles your comments.

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOgcT0OARciE2X%2BU0rjSKp9VuC279dYcCGkc3nCWKhHQ1_m2rw%40mail.gmail.com

--

Beena Emerson

EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
default_range_partition_v7.patch application/octet-stream 28.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Beena Emerson 2017-07-14 09:58:18 Re: Default Partition for Range
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-07-14 09:09:12 Re: Authentication mechanisms categorization