Re: increasing the default WAL segment size

From: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Date: 2017-02-20 09:17:32
Message-ID: CAOG9ApGA+wnE3d87edvxhJpLE0==3fLFvEU0QDf_XwPT-NxG4Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > PFA the updated patches.
> I've started reviewing the patches.
> 01-add-XLogSegmentOffset-macro.patch looks clean to me. I'll post my
> detailed review after looking into the second patch. But, both the
> patches needs a rebase based on the commit 85c11324cabaddcfaf3347df7
> (Rename user-facing tools with "xlog" in the name to say "wal").
>
>

PFA the rebased patches.

Thank you,

Beena Emerson

Have a Great Day!

Attachment Content-Type Size
01-add-XLogSegmentOffset-macro.patch application/octet-stream 16.5 KB
02-initdb-walsegsize-v2.patch application/octet-stream 33.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-02-20 09:21:05 Re: Gather Merge
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-02-20 09:15:00 Re: GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.