Re: Default Partition for Range

From: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Default Partition for Range
Date: 2017-06-15 05:50:39
Message-ID: CAOG9ApF=ew7-kG1QicHiB8r_9Rge+OCEnDRAvSkJSaEpWEWQRQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

PFA the updated patch.
This is rebased over v21 patches of list partition.
(http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org/msg316818.html)

--

Beena Emerson

EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
default_range_partition_v5.patch application/octet-stream 29.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mengxing Liu 2017-06-15 05:51:52 [GSOC] [Weekly report 2] Eliminate O(N^2) scaling from rw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions
Previous Message Amit Langote 2017-06-15 05:16:32 Re: A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition()