Re: suggest to rename enable_incrementalsort

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: suggest to rename enable_incrementalsort
Date: 2020-06-21 07:05:32
Message-ID: CAOBaU_bsOKEXgF_ik3bjAfV7HQAM+2MTbAwtKujqiu1YueeUiQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 8:26 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I suggest to rename enable_incrementalsort to enable_incremental_sort.
> This is obviously more readable and also how we have named recently
> added multiword planner parameters.
>
> See attached patch.

+1, this is a way better name (and patch LGTM on REL_13_STABLE).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2020-06-21 07:10:35 tag typos in "catalog.sgml"
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2020-06-21 07:01:12 Re: [PATCH] Missing links between system catalog documentation pages