Re: Fix parallel vacuum buffer usage reporting

From: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>
To: Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix parallel vacuum buffer usage reporting
Date: 2024-05-03 06:41:42
Message-ID: CAO6_XqpmPq1W9mG1nygKmmXHj-4_kf0zjSsoir0hsM81uNtc2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 5:37 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Thank you for further testing! I've pushed the patch.

Thanks!

Here is the rebased version for the follow-up patch removing VacuumPage
variables. Though I'm not sure if I should create a dedicated mail thread
since the bug was fixed and the follow-up is more of a refactoring. What
do you think?

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Use-pgBufferUsage-for-block-reporting-in-analyze.patch application/octet-stream 6.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2024-05-03 06:47:20 Re: Document NULL
Previous Message Hans Buschmann 2024-05-03 06:22:34 AW: Proposal: Early providing of PGDG repositories for the major Linux distributions like Fedora or Debian