Re: Using indexUnchanged with nbtree

From: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using indexUnchanged with nbtree
Date: 2021-10-01 14:21:40
Message-ID: CANbhV-FA4EoL+LZ6OVfq+odhpdwOCzDH0hkah1Z3So1C1gq-Yg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 15:20, Jaime Casanova
<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:

> This has been stalled since July, and based on Peter's comment i feel we
> should mark this as RwF. Which i'm doing now.
>
> Please feel free to resubmit for Next Commitfest.

Agreed, thank you Jaime.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2021-10-01 14:25:10 Re: Numeric x^y for negative x
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2021-10-01 14:20:01 Re: Using indexUnchanged with nbtree