Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2024-02-16 00:51:39
Message-ID: CANWCAZZmTRanZrpNdLANwhQYacsp5cMj0Tw-98ccrouihJMUAg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

v61 had a brown-paper-bag bug in the embedded tids patch that didn't
present in the tidstore test, but caused vacuum to fail, fixed in v62.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v62-ART.tar.gz application/gzip 59.9 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2024-02-16 00:58:41 Re: When extended query protocol ends?
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2024-02-16 00:50:27 Re: When extended query protocol ends?