Re: Improving and extending int128.h to more of numeric.c

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving and extending int128.h to more of numeric.c
Date: 2025-07-18 06:47:46
Message-ID: CANWCAZZEi1UmT1fZOOyJGpJqRbE92D4TRK+KE-PKXK0N3sQ1MQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 2:30 PM Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> BTW, my other motivation for doing this was to simplify the numeric
> code. Even if this had zero performance benefit, as long as it didn't
> make things any slower, I would argue that it's worth doing.

I gathered that was the main motivation, and I agree. I looked over
0005 and don't see any issues.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael J. Baars 2025-07-18 07:01:19 Lossless transmission of double precision floating point
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2025-07-18 06:46:06 Re: Proposal: Out-of-Order NOTIFY via GUC to Improve LISTEN/NOTIFY Throughput