| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 |
| Date: | 2018-02-01 15:21:10 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jJ-Wt_cZ782iHBL-_ouPwmYDrSp2F52yYy+=M_mvvURtA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1 February 2018 at 12:45, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I think it would be very helpful if we could discuss everything with
> direct relevance to v14, so this becomes a patch review, not just a
> debate.
> i.e. which isolation test would we like to change from ERROR to
> success? or which new test would you like to add?
>
> Thanks
In my understanding, we are discussing changing the potential outcome
from concurrent operations on the small subset of test results noted
in the attached patch-on-patch. (This will break the patch tester)
If you can confirm these are the ones we are discussing and say what
you think the output should be, that will help us be very specific .
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| merge_indoubt_concurrent_output.v1.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-02-01 15:31:40 | Re: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-02-01 15:20:54 | Re: no partition pruning when partitioning using array type |