From: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Fix OAuth feature detection on OpenBSD+Meson |
Date: | 2025-06-30 15:15:01 |
Message-ID: | CAN55FZ2C=y7DHr2D9ojYdyfmt7LXpz25FrWfBfb0WUn-8QgXCQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 at 17:45, Jacob Champion
<jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 3:46 AM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I wanted to experiment with it.
>
> That was fast, thank you!
>
> > First, I got the current list of
> > features from upstream, then disabled the auto features, then
> > explicitly enabled these features. I did this only for FreeBSD to show
> > my idea roughly.
> >
> > There are two patches; 0001 disables auto features for all of the
> > tasks and 0002 explicitly enables these features for FreeBSD.
>
> Just from a stylistic perspective, I think I'd prefer for
> `--auto-features=disabled` to be folded into the beginning of the
> MESON_FEATURES variable. Or is there another reason to control them
> fully independently?
No, I had thought people would prefer to control auto-features from
one central place but apparently I was wrong :) I will update the
patch according to this.
> Also: how do we ensure that none of the previously enabled features
> were missed in this list, for all the OSes we've modified? (I'm a
> Meson novice.)
I am not sure, I do not know if there is a way to ensure that. I just
manually checked features from the end of the 'meson setup' command's
output. I think this should be enough but of course an automated way
would be better if there is any.
> > What do you think about this approach? If you are okay with this, I
> > can apply it to all CI tasks (and possibly create another thread for
> > it).
>
> Seems good to me. I think a new top-level thread would be good too, to
> get more eyes on the changes.
Thanks! I will create the thread soon.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | jian he | 2025-06-30 15:17:49 | Re: New function normal_rand_array function to contrib/tablefunc. |
Previous Message | jian he | 2025-06-30 15:04:25 | array_random |