From: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com" <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io |
Date: | 2024-04-24 08:37:21 |
Message-ID: | CAN55FZ1x3paMJu6k+_NkkKd5N7aFpBjBadf=zDsfNhndNh0FCg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 11:01, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 04:22, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 03:20:39PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> > > > I agree with your points. While the other I/O related work is
> > > > happening we can discuss what we should do in the variable op_byte
> > > > cases. Also, this is happening only for WAL right now but if we try to
> > > > extend pg_stat_io in the future, that problem possibly will rise
> > > > again. So, it could be good to come up with a general solution, not
> > > > only for WAL.
> > >
> > > Okay, I've marked the patch as RwF for this CF.
Since the last commitfest entry was returned with feedback, I created
a new commitfest entry: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/4950/
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-04-24 08:38:01 | Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3 |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-04-24 07:57:38 | Re: Is it acceptable making COPY format extendable? |