On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 at 14:07, Jonah H. Harris <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Two options presented:
>
> - Hard patch removes FATAL/PANIC from client_message_level_options in
> guc.c, which also seems to make sense in regard to it's double-usage
> with trace_recovery_messages.
>
> - Soft patch keeps FATAL/PANIC in client_message_level_options but coerces
> client_min_messages to ERROR when set to FATAL/PANIC and issues a warning.
> This also exports error_severity from elog.c to retrieve severity -> text
> mappings for the warning message.
>
>
What about no-op (soft patch) for 11.1 and backpatches, error (hard patch)
for 12?