Re: Fix crash during recovery when redo segment is missing

From: Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Fix crash during recovery when redo segment is missing
Date: 2025-12-04 06:36:30
Message-ID: CAMm1aWZY4chT4PPhv95rrt5tqP0LmRwTxHYX+DtJXwMDc657yA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Apologies, I missed attaching the patch earlier. Please find the v2
version attached.

Best Regards,
Nitin Jadhav
Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Microsoft

On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 12:01 PM Nitin Jadhav
<nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The patch wasn’t applying cleanly on master, so I’ve rebased it and
> also added it to the PG19‑4 CommitFest:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6279/
> Please review and share your feedback.
>
> Best Regards,
> Nitin Jadhav
> Azure Database for PostgreSQL
> Microsoft
>
> Best Regards,
> Nitin Jadhav
> Azure Database for PostgreSQL
> Microsoft
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 4:29 PM Nitin Jadhav
> <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In [1], Andres reported a bug where PostgreSQL crashes during recovery
> > if the segment containing the redo pointer does not exist. I have
> > attempted to address this issue and I am sharing a patch for the same.
> >
> > The problem was that PostgreSQL did not PANIC when the redo LSN and
> > checkpoint LSN were in separate segments, and the file containing the
> > redo LSN was missing, leading to a crash. Andres has provided a
> > detailed analysis of the behavior across different settings and
> > versions. Please refer to [1] for more information. This issue arises
> > because PostgreSQL does not PANIC initially.
> >
> > The issue was resolved by ensuring that the REDO location exists once
> > we successfully read the checkpoint record in InitWalRecovery(). This
> > prevents control from reaching PerformWalRecovery() unless the WAL
> > file containing the redo record exists. A new test script,
> > 044_redo_segment_missing.pl, has been added to validate this. To
> > populate the WAL file with a redo record different from the WAL file
> > with the checkpoint record, I wait for the checkpoint start message
> > and then issue a pg_switch_wal(), which should occur before the
> > completion of the checkpoint. Then, I crash the server, and during the
> > restart, it should log an appropriate error indicating that it could
> > not find the redo location. Please let me know if there is a better
> > way to reproduce this behavior. I have tested and verified this with
> > the various scenarios Andres pointed out in [1]. Please note that this
> > patch does not address error checking in StartupXLOG(),
> > CreateCheckPoint(), etc., nor does it focus on cleaning up existing
> > code.
> >
> > Attaching the patch. Please review and share your feedback. Thanks to
> > Andres for spotting the bug and providing the detailed report [1].
> >
> > [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20231023232145.cmqe73stvivsmlhs%40awork3.anarazel.de
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Nitin Jadhav
> > Azure Database for PostgreSQL
> > Microsoft

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Fix-crash-during-recovery-when-redo-segment-is-missi.patch application/octet-stream 6.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shlok Kyal 2025-12-04 06:36:44 Re: How can end users know the cause of LR slot sync delays?
Previous Message Nitin Jadhav 2025-12-04 06:31:24 Re: Fix crash during recovery when redo segment is missing