Re: queries are fast after dump->restore but slow again after some days dispite vacuum

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Felix Scheicher <mandavi(at)web(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: queries are fast after dump->restore but slow again after some days dispite vacuum
Date: 2012-07-19 16:12:08
Message-ID: CAMkU=1zC6qCJL+7o7mbxV9k1r39PO9u=Cba8h2F6VAY+6XDNBQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Felix Scheicher <mandavi(at)web(dot)de> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew <at> dunslane.net> writes:
>
>> Try running CLUSTER on the relevant tables and see if it makes a
>> difference. If it does you might want to look into using pg_reorg
>> periodically.
>
>
> That worked like a charm! Many thanks. But how comes, the queries are also fast
> after a restore without the cluster?

Probably fewer buffers needed to be touched.

Running "explain (analyze, buffers)" would give information on how
many buffers were touched.

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-07-19 16:17:12 Re: [PERFORM] DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-07-19 15:48:46 Re: queries are fast after dump->restore but slow again after some days dispite vacuum