Re: problems with large objects dump

From: Sergio Gabriel Rodriguez <sgrodriguez(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: problems with large objects dump
Date: 2012-09-20 15:53:10
Message-ID: CAMHBdEroekZuQZdqXyX5m=_Z6L-+-k_jWvnEi5JbkS_iy_LQ+w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> You wouldn't happen to be
> trying to use a 9.0 or later pg_dump would you? Exactly what 8.4.x
> release is this, anyway?
>
>
>
Tom, thanks for replying, yes, we tried it with postgres postgres 9.1 and
9.2 and the behavior is exactly the same. The production version is 8.4.9

Greetings,

sergio.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-09-20 16:33:21 Re: problems with large objects dump
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-09-20 14:35:08 Re: problems with large objects dump