Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: scale up (postgresql vs mssql)

From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter(at)googlemail(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Eyal Wilde <eyal(at)impactsoft(dot)co(dot)il>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: scale up (postgresql vs mssql)
Date: 2012-05-09 07:11:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> let's see the query plan...when you turned it off, did it go faster?
> put your suspicious plans here:

I suggest to post three plans:

1. insert into temp table
2. access to temp table before analyze
3. access to temp table after analyze

Maybe getting rid of the temp table (e.g. using a view or even an
inline view) is even better than optimizing temp table access.

Kind regards


remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2012-05-09 12:53:01
Subject: Re: scale up (postgresql vs mssql)
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-05-08 16:17:55
Subject: Re: Sudden Query slowdown on our Postgresql Server

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group