Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench

From: Raúl Marín Rodríguez <rmrodriguez(at)carto(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench
Date: 2017-12-01 09:57:19
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers


I've rebased the patch so it can be applied cleanly on top of current

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>

> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:34 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
> > Let's now hope that a committer gets around to consider these patch some
> > day.
> Which is not the case yet, so moved to CF 2018-01. Please note that
> the patch proposed does not apply anymore, so its status is changed to
> "waiting on author" for a rebase.
> --
> Michael


*Raúl Marín Rodríguez *

Attachment Content-Type Size
pgbench_pow_v6.patch text/x-patch 4.9 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-12-01 10:13:41 Use get_greatest_modulus() in partition_bounds_equal()
Previous Message Antonin Houska 2017-12-01 09:01:34 Re: Unclear regression test for postgres_fdw