Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping

From: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping
Date: 2018-04-10 14:27:51
Message-ID: CAM2+6=U3AnOxENY6uEA_mxFDpQA-39cEPx0undW1f9m6f7REFg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 7:30 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:

> Hi Jeevan,
>
> On 4/2/18 10:57 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Jeevan Chalke
> > <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Yep, I see the risk.
> >
> > Committed 0001 last week and 0002 just now. I don't really see 0003 a
> > a critical need. If somebody demonstrates that this saves a
> > meaningful amount of planning time, we can consider that part for a
> > future release.
>
> The bulk of this patch was committed so I have marked it that way.
>

Thanks, David.

>
> If you would like to pursue patch 03 I think it would be best to start a
> new thread and demonstrate how the patch will improve performance.
>

Sure.

>
> Regards,
> --
> -David
> david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
>

--
Jeevan Chalke
Technical Architect, Product Development
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?= 2018-04-10 14:31:28 Re: Transform for pl/perl
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2018-04-10 14:20:16 Re: Faster inserts with mostly-monotonically increasing values