Re: [PATCH] Introduce array_shuffle() and array_sample()

From: "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Martin Kalcher <martin(dot)kalcher(at)aboutsource(dot)net>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce array_shuffle() and array_sample()
Date: 2023-03-20 19:34:55
Message-ID: CAM-w4HNZoge9ZunFrRDSv3G5MisXGSNAFD4Oy3Sp7L8YJVsdqw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 29 Sept 2022 at 15:34, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Martin Kalcher <martin(dot)kalcher(at)aboutsource(dot)net> writes:
> > New patch: array_shuffle() and array_sample() use pg_global_prng_state now.
>
> I took a closer look at the patch today. I find this behavior a bit
> surprising:
>

It looks like this patch received useful feedback and it wouldn't take
much to push it over the line. But it's been Waiting On Author since
last September.

Martin, any chance of getting these last bits of feedback resolved so
it can be Ready for Commit?

--
Gregory Stark
As Commitfest Manager

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2023-03-20 19:35:04 Re: Schema/user/role
Previous Message Bryn Llewellyn 2023-03-20 18:57:21 Re: Schema/user/role

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2023-03-20 19:51:15 Re: Save a few bytes in pg_attribute
Previous Message Gregory Stark (as CFM) 2023-03-20 19:30:41 Re: [PATCH] Add initial xid/mxid/mxoff to initdb