Re: more ALTER .. DEPENDS ON EXTENSION fixes

From: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Ahsan Hadi <ahsan(dot)hadi(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: more ALTER .. DEPENDS ON EXTENSION fixes
Date: 2020-03-05 19:05:00
Message-ID: CALtqXTcogrFEVP9uou5vFtnGsn+vHZUu9+9a0inarfYVOHScYQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 11:38 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:

> On 2020-Mar-05, Ibrar Ahmed wrote:
>
> > Is this intentional that there is no error when removing a non-existing
> > dependency?
>
> Hmm, I think we can do nothing silently if nothing is called for.
> So, yes, that seems to be the way it should work.
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>

I think we need a tab-completion patch too for this.

--
Ibrar Ahmed

Attachment Content-Type Size
004_tab_complete.patch application/octet-stream 1.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2020-03-05 19:05:13 Re: Allowing ALTER TYPE to change storage strategy
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-03-05 18:38:35 Re: more ALTER .. DEPENDS ON EXTENSION fixes